Pappas v. Keely
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Pee Curiam,
These appeals by the defendant, in her individual and representative capacities, are from an order removing a compulsory nonsuit and granting the plaintiff a new trial. Such an order is plainly interlocutory and unappealable. The appeals will, therefore, be quashed. Szmigel v. Director General of Railroads, 266 Pa. 573, 110 A. 639; see also Dellacasse v. Floyd, 332 Pa. 218, 221, 2 A. 2d 860; and DiGregorio v. Skinner, 351 Pa. 441, 446, 41 A. 2d 649.
Appeals quashed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dellacasse v. Floyd Exrs.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Di Gregorio v. Skinner, (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Szmigel v. Director General of RailroadsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kline v. State Public School Building AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Ginsburg v. Hilsdorf, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1965