Legal Opinion

In Re Scannell

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided July 27, 2011No. 19-10392PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

J. MICHAEL DEASY, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On May 25, 2011, the Court held a non-evidentiary hearing on a motion filed by the Debtor pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(2) seeking to avoid a judicial lien obtained prepetition by the Debtor’s brother Paul Scannell (Doc. No. 12). Paul Scannell objected to the motion on various grounds (Doc. No. 33). At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court ordered the parties to file memoranda of law on the issue of whether, when performing the lien avoidance calculation under § 522(f)(2), the Debtor must use the amount of the exemption…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Schwab v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. In Re MontgomeryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1987
  5. In Re MitchellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re SchmidtkeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2014
  2. Kimberly C. SutterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
  3. Michael A DelongUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API