Legal Opinion

Mood v. Mader

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1931No. 22739. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This is an action of equitable cognizance, brought by the respondent, Jesse Mood, seeking to have confirmed by the court his claim to a one-eighth interest in certain real property. Judgment went in his favor in the court below, and the defendants in the action, Louis F. Mader and The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, appeal.

The facts are somewhat involved, and require some detail of statement. On and prior to February 6,1910, one William S. Mood and Sadie Mood, his wife, the father and mother of the respondent Jesse Mood, owned, as a community, certain real property situated in the county…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dormitzer v. German Savings & Loan SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Vanhorn v. NestossWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. F. T. Larrabee Co. v. MayhewWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Bradley v. MayhewWashington Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Quesnell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hansen v. LindellWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Batey v. BateyWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Bishop v. LynchWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. In Re the Guardianship of WhitishWashington Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API