Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 7, 2000No. SC96794Published

1Per curiam

We have for review Rodriguez v. State, 742 So.2d 422 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), which is a per curiam decision without opinion citing only to Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), quashed, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981).

This Court recently held in Peart v. State, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000), that a defendant may seek postconviction relief based on a claim that he or she was not advised of the immigration consequences of a plea. We emphasize that all such claims filed subsequent to our decision…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jollie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. Peart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. Peart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API