Rodriguez v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We have for review Rodriguez v. State, 742 So.2d 422 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), which is a per curiam decision without opinion citing only to Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), quashed, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981).
This Court recently held in Peart v. State, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000), that a defendant may seek postconviction relief based on a claim that he or she was not advised of the immigration consequences of a plea. We emphasize that all such claims filed subsequent to our decision…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jollie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Peart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Peart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999