Legal Opinion

State v. Kelly

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1983No. 82-178PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

Defendant appeals from a conviction of criminal possession of dangerous drugs with intent to sell, following trial without jury in the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County. We affirm.

Defendant raises the following issues:

1. Were the searches in Hawaii illegal and was evidence seized as a result of those searches tainted?

2. Was the opening of the package by the Bozeman police, and their inventory of its contents, an unconstitutional search and an invasion of defendant’s right of privacy?

3. Did the issuing magistrate in Montana lack jurisdiction to issue the first search warrant?

*4224.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. HardawayMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. ReesmanMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hoang v. Assurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  5. State v. DiazSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API