Legal Opinion

In re Smith

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 18, 1907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

•Peter Schmuck, for bankrupt. Adolph M. Schwarz, Strasbourger, Weil, Eschwege & Schallek, and Arthur Garfield Hays, for creditors.

1Opinion of the Court

CHATFIEED, District Judge.

The bankrupt has asked leave to withdraw, these proceedings, which were instituted by the filing of a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, upon the 11th day of January, 1907. From, that date until the present time the matter has followed the usual course, but the first meeting of creditors has been adjourned for a considerable period because of the illness of the attorney for the bankrupt. His death has necessitated the employment of another attorney. It now1 appears that upon the 17th day of January, 1902, in a former voluntary proceeding, the bankrupt herein was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re LittleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re NashDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1918
  2. Matter of PoirierUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1982
  3. Prince v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1960
  4. In re EpsteinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API