Legal Opinion

Kier v. Condrack

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1970No. 11994PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff James Kier sued for specific performance of a contract to purchase the home property of the defendants Condraclc at about 4900 South on the west side of Washington Boulevard in Ogden, Utah. The defense relied upon at the trial, and persisted in on this appeal, is that the option was unenforceable because it was (a) given without consideration, (b) not properly exercised, and (c) not definite as to terms. Upon a plenary trial, the district *141court found the issues in favor of the plaintiff and ordered the defendants to convey him the property upon the payment of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ansorge v. KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Continental Bank and Trust Company v. BybeeUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Pitcher v. LauritzenUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Morris v. BallardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reed v. AlveyUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Tanner v. BaadsgaardUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. D. H. Overmyer Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  4. Dickson v. McMahanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  5. Regal Realsource v. EnlawCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API