Legal Opinion

Thurston v. Koch

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 1, 1800PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

4 U.S. 348 (____)

4 Dall. 348

Thurston

versus

Koch.

Supreme Court of United States.

Condy, for the plaintiff, and Ingersoll, for the defendant.

PATERSON, Justice.

The case before the Court is that of a double insurance; and the question is, whether the insurers shall contribute rateably, or shall pay according to priority of contract, until the insured be satisfied to the amount of his loss. The law on this subject, is different in different nations of Europe, owing to the diversity of local ordinances, which have been made to regulate commercial transactions. By the ordinance of one country, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thurston v. KochU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1805

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nichols & Fay v. Rensselaer County Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Stacey v. Franklin Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  3. Whiting ex rel. Sun Mutual Insurance v. Independent Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  4. American Insurance v. GriswoldCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
  5. Reliance Insurance v. Allstate Indemnity Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API