Legal Opinion

McBride v. Jacob

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1918No. Docket No. 100PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Hally, J. Bill by Edward McBride, Charles M. Earl, and Daniel J. Pollard, copartners as McBride, Earl & Pollard, against Max Jacob, Ben Jacob, Samuel Jacob, and William Jacob, copartners as M. Jacob & Sons, to restrain the traffic in bottles, etc., bearing plaintiffs’ registered trade-name. From an order granting a motion to dismiss, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiffs, manufacturers of soda water and other beverages, seek by this bill to restrain defendants, junk dealers, from trafficking in bottles or other receptacles which belong to plaintiffs, and which have upon them plaintiffs’ trade-name, registered pursuant to the provisions of Act No. 164, Pub. Acts 1905 (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 7404 et seq.). This *527act is, with slight additions and the elimination of a proviso in section 2, a re-enactment of Act No. 224, Pub. Acts 1901, which, in turn, with slight additions, is but a re-enactment of Act No. 36, Pub. Acts 1897 (2 Comp. Laws, § 5676 et…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Fitzpatrick v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Giddens v. MirkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  4. Roberts v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Brassington v. WaldronMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. RaubMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. People v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API