Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Nash

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 2007No. 05-0538PublishedCited by 151 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jefferson

While death is certain, divorce is not. In this case, the testator anticipated the former but did not prepare for the latter. His will- — executed while he was married and designating his then-spouse as primary beneficiary — remained unchanged when he died, notwithstanding his divorce some two years earlier. The Legislature addressed devises in favor of former spouses by enacting Probate Code section 69, which provides that if a testator divorces after executing a will, provisions that favor the former spouse must be read as if the former spouse predeceased the testator. The question…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. City of San Antonio v. City of BoerneTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In Re the City of GeorgetownTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Sultan v. MathewTexas Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by151 opinions

  1. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. SummersTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, A/S/O Mirsan, L.P., D/B/A Sienna Ridge Apartments v. Carmen A. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Greater Houston Partnership v. Ken Paxton, Texas Attorney General And Jim JenkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Stanley Bacon, Jr. v. Texas Historical Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2013
  5. Shook v. Walden, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010

146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API