Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Thornton

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 30, 1899No. 1,240PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the United States Court of Appeals in the-Indian Territory.

1Opinion of the Court

CALDWELL, Circuit Judge.

This was an action of unlawful detainer instituted by Daniel Sanders, the plaintiff in error, against W. R. Thornton, the defendant in error. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is a citizen by adoption of the Cherokee Nation, and that defendant is a citizen of the United States; that the plaintiff is the owner of the lands in controversy, and that he leased them to the defendant for the term of six years, who took possession of them as his tenant, and, after the expiration of the term, and after notice in writing to surrender the premises, refused to do so, hut…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. National Bank v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Fritts v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Reynolds v. Crawfordsville First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Seymour v. Slide & Spur Gold MinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. MooreCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1901
  2. Battle v. AtkinsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · 1902
  3. Casteel v. McNeelyCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API