Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Waterbury Renewal Econ. Devel., No. 091328 (Feb. 19, 1991)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 19, 1991No. 091328Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE MOTION TO DISMISS (#126) The defendant has moved to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint on the ground that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Practice Book, 143(1). The defendant advances two reasons in support of its claim: (1) that the plaintiff failed to comply with the notice requirement of 7-101a(d) of the Connecticut General Statutes; and (2) that the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker's Compensation Act (31-284 (a) and 293(a)), Connecticut General Statutes) bars the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fraser v. HenningerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  2. Baskin's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. City of Norwich v. SilverbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Fusaro v. Chase Brass & Copper Company, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API