Legal Opinion
Nicolitz v. Board of Opticianry
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 24, 1992No. 92-2717PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
609 So.2d 92 (1992)
Elizabeth NICOLITZ, Petitioner,
v.
BOARD OF OPTICIANRY and Department of Professional Regulation, Respondents.
No. 92-2717.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
November 24, 1992.
Paul Watson Lambert, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Claire D. Dryfuss, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent Bd. of Opticianry.
Lisa S. Nelson, Asst. General Counsel, Lucy Schneider, Senior Atty., for respondent Dept. of Professional Regulation.
ON REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION
2Per curiam
The petition of respondent, Board of Opticianry, for rehearing or…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Tuckman v. Florida State UniversityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
4Cited by9 opinions
- Meller v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Schafer v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS AND PROF. REG.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Gonzalez v. Department of Business & Professional RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Cambas v. Department of Business & Professional RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Hadi v. Liberty Behavioral Health Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.