Winkfield v. Brinkman
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Barton Eistrict Court. A sufficient statement of the case appears in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The petition in error filed March 16, 1883, sets forth that-the judgment was rendered in this case on the *2629th day of November, 1881, when the district court was not in session, and that such judgment is void therefor; it further sets forth that another pretended judgment was rendered in this case, on the 8th day of March, 1882, which, for various reasons, it avers is void also. Clearly the judgment rendered on the 29th day of November, 1881, is wholly void, and cannot be enforced. (Earls v. Earls, 27 Kas. 538.) But the trial court…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Earls v. EarlsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baker v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Gwinnup v. GriffinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Fleeman v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910