Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick Concrete Co. v. Birmingham Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 3, 1992No. 1902016Published

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether a supplier of materials for the construction of a building on leased premises submitted substantial evidence that the landlord was equitably estopped from denying that the supplier has a lien on the land for the payment of the materials furnished. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of the landlord. We reverse and remand.

Some of the basic facts are not in dispute. Birmingham Realty Company, Inc. (“Birmingham Realty”), owned the land that is the subject of the controversy. It had leased the land for a five-year term to Walker…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Mazer v. Jackson Ins. AgencySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Harden v. Wood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. First Ave. C. & L. Co. v. McWilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. Lloyd v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API