Legal Opinion

Phoenix Insurance v. Mills

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 31, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Assumpsit, on an insurance policy. Trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County; the Hon. Joseph P. Robarts, Judge, presiding. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Appeal by defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Worthington

This is an action, on an insurance policy issued by appellant to appellee on a stock of groceries in a building then owned by a Mrs. Frank Hopkins, located in Makanda, Illinois.

The declaration contains three counts—two on the policy and the third the common counts. Appellant tiled four pleas, but relies only on the general issue and the third plea, which is as follows:

“ And for a third plea in this behalf said defendant says, ‘ actio non,’ because it says it is further provided in and by said insurance policy, set out in plaintiff’s declaration, among other things, as follows: ‘ This company…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Aetna Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1960
  2. Phenix Insurance v. MillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  3. Automotive Co. v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. First National Bank v. German American InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Getty v. North River InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API