Legal Opinion
TEXAS a & M UNIVERSITY v. Bishop
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided May 15, 2003No. 14-97-00153-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND
PAUL C. MURPHY, Senior Chief Justice (Assigned).
This appeal arises from a suit for personal injuries suffered by Paul A. Bishop while portraying “Vlad Dracula” in a play performed by the Texas A & M University at Galveston Drama Club. Texas A & M University (TAMU) challenges the judgment in favor of Bishop in eleven points of error. In our original opinion, we found legally insufficient evidence to support the jury’s findings that Michael and Diane Wonio, Dr. Stephen Curley, and Dr. Melanie Lesko were employees of TAMU on the occasion in question. Therefore, we reversed and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Lancaster v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- TEXAS a & M UNIVERSITY v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- City of San Antonio v. Butler, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
- University of Texas Health Science Center v. Schroeder, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Robinson v. University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- City of Dayton v. Gates, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.