Vandor v. Roach
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, 0.
— The plaintiff claimed that the defendant’s intestate gave to her on his death-bed five United States bonds which stood in his name. There was no indorsement or written transfer, and she brought this action to obtain a decree directing the administrator “ to* make a good and sufficient transfer of said bonds to plaintiff by his assignment in writing.” The court below gave judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals. - t,
*615The only points made on behalf of the appellant are the following:—
1. It is argued that the burden of proof was upon the plaintiff to show that “the gift…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bedell v. . CarllNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
3Cited by10 opinions
- Leyson v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1895
- Foley v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Edwards v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Mallett v. HallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
- Reh v. ErtrachterMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.