Legal Opinion

Buckalew v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1870PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court of Randolph. Tried before Hon. John Henderson. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtB. F. Saffold, J.

This was a motion by the appellees, to enter satisfaction of a judgment recovered against them and others at the spring term, 1861, of the circuit court, and affirmed at the June term, 1861, of the supreme court.

The ground of the motion was, that the applicants were merely the sureties of S. W. Herren, and they notified the plaintiff to make the money out of the property of Herren when he might have done it, but he neglected and refused to do so until Herren became insolvent. An issue of fact was made up between the parties and submitted to a jury. On their verdict, the court entered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
  2. Agee v. SteeleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  3. Bank of Alabama v. GoddenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  4. Caller v. VivianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ray v. BrennerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  2. Quillen v. QuigleyNevada Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Ray v. BrennerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API