Legal Opinion

Estate of Rodgers v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 26, 2006No. 05-1382UnpublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Chief Judge:

The Estate of Tarik K. Rodgers (the Estate) brought this federal civil rights action, see 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West 2003), claiming violations of the Fourth Amendment in connection with the death of Tarik Rodgers (Rodgers). The Estate now appeals a decision of the district court granting summary judgment, on the basis of qualified immunity, to certain of the defendants.1 For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

The pertinent facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the Estate, see Wilson v. Flynn, 429 F.3d 465, 466 (4th Cir.2005), are as follows. On April 14, 2002,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brockington v. BoykinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  2. Herman Harris v. Zachary PittmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  3. Webb v. RALEIGH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENTDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2010
  4. Moody v. City of Newport NewsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
  5. Lee v. City of RichmondDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API