Legal Opinion

Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Monmouth County Municipal Joint Insurance Fund

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 25, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

STEIN, J.

This appeal concerns the liability of a municipality’s insurance earner (or self-insurance fund) for uninsured-motorist (UM) benefits to a covered employee who also has UM benefits available under his automobile-insurance policy. The municipality asserts that the overriding philosophy of public-entity immunity from tort liability under the New Jersey Tort Claims Act (Tort Claims Act), N.J.S.A. 59:1-1 to 12-3, would be circumvented if municipal-insurance coverage were to be liable on a pro rata basis for UM benefits payable because a public…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rochinsky v. State of NJ, Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Midland Insurance v. ColatrellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Christy v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. Weiss v. New Jersey TransitSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  5. Ross v. Transport of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. ZornNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
  2. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  3. Prud. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Monmouth County Mun.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API