Legal Opinion · Dissent

Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Lord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1963Published

1Dissent

Valente, J. (dissenting).

Subdivision 1 of section 142 of the Insurance Law, quoted verbatim in the majority opinion, provides that every policy of life insurance delivered in the State must contain the entire contract between the parties, and that no application for the issuance of any such policy should *72be admissible in evidence unless a true copy of such application was attached to the policy when issued. This is a mandate that all matters affecting the validity of the policy be incorporated in one single instrument so that the insured and beneficiaries have notice of everything upon which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bible v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Berkshire Life Insurance v. WeinigNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Axelroad v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Abbott v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Davern v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API