Legal Opinion

Percosky v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1984No. Appeal, No. 102 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barry,

Prank V. Percosky (Claimant) appeals a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed a referee’s determination denying Claimant unemployment compensation benefits for the period from September 12, 1981 through October 20, 1981 because he was found to have violated the “spirit and intent” of Section 401(d)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Act), Act of December 5,1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §801 (d)(1). This provision holds that unemployment “ [compensation shall be payable to any employe who is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Myers v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Goodwin v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Craig v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. WilsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Humanic v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fulton v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API