Legal Opinion

All Underwriters v. Mark Weisberg

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 18, 2000No. 99-11778PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUBINA, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves the question of whether a district court may award attorney’s fees pursuant to a state statute in a marine insurance contract dispute. The district court answered the question in the negative. We reverse.

I. Background

Appellants, Mark Weisberg and Robert Berzon (“Weisberg,” “Berzon,” or collectively, “Appellants”), entered into a marine insurance contract with Appellee, Underwriters at Lloyds, London (“Underwriters”), to insure Appellants’ 32 foot motor vessel named “After Hours.” The policy provided hull and machinery coverage for $50,000, beginning…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. TallentireSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Axess International Ltd. v. Intercargo InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Paul v. All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. All Underwriters v. WeisbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Woods Masonry, Inc. v. Monumental General Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002
  5. Quintero v. Geico Marine Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API