Medina v. People

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice McWilliams.

Medina was convicted by a jury of the crimes of burglary second degree and larceny of personal property of a value in excess of $50 and thereafter he was sen tenced to a separate term in the State Penitentiary for each of these two crimes, the sentences, however, to' run concurrently. By this writ of error, as we understand it, Medina seeks only a reversal of the larceny conviction, inasmuch as counsel in his written brief and again in oral argument has conceded, for all practical purposes at least, that the record does support the burglary conviction.

Alt…