Federal Insurance v. Waldorf-Astoria Hotel
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtHilda G. Schwartz, J.
Defendant hotel moves for summary judgment under section 200 of the General Business Law which provides that the proprietor of a hotel is relieved from liability for loss to a guest of his money, jewels, ornaments, bank notes, bonds, negotiable securities or precious stones, if the hotel provides a place of safekeeping and patrons do not avail themselves of it. Defendant argues that the gold cuff links lost by plaintiff’s subrogors satisfied the definition of “jewels” under section 200.
Plaintiff makes a cross motion for summary judgment, arguing that the articles lost were not “ jewels,” “…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Millhiser v. Beau Site Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Waters Co. v. . GerardNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Ramaley v. . LelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Rosenplaenter v. . RoessleNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Gile v. LibbyNew York Supreme Court · 1861
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Klim v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
- DePaemelaere v. DavisCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
- Spiller v. Barclay HotelCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- Bhattal v. Grand Hyatt-New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983