Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 31, 1979No. 34102PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Justice.

This court granted certiorari to consider the question of the damages recoverable by the grantee in a warranty deed, who had paid the nominal sum of $10 as consideration for the deed, against a remote warrantor of title, for the breach of the warranty as to 98.43 acres of the property conveyed by the remote warrantor.

The Court of Appeals in reviewing a judgment for damages of $38,100 for breach of warranty held that the grantee in a warranty deed, the applicant for certiorari here, could not recover an amount exceeding the amount he had paid for his deed. Smith v. Smith, 146…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  2. Taylor v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Croom v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Martin v. GordonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
  5. West v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cary v. GuiragossianSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Hodges v. CallawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  3. Riggins v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  4. Moss v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API