Legal Opinion

People v. Hirschberg

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1951No. 31520PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chibe Justice Daily

delivered the opinion of the court:

In this review, Isadore Hirschberg, plaintiff in error, contends that the second of two judgments of conviction entered against him at one term of the criminal court of Cook County in December, 1946, is too indefinite to comply with the requirements for consecutive sentences. He seeks a ruling that his two sentences are to be served concurrently. An additional record filed by the People shows that the judgment attacked was corrected by a nunc pro tunc order entered by the criminal court on November 28, 1950, so that its objectionable…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dowdell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. The People v. DelisleIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. The People v. ForsythIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  4. People v. PuschmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. GacyIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. The People v. IzzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. People v. MartineIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. CollinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. People v. DudenIllinois Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API