Browning v. Poirier
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTorpy, C.J.
My colleagues hold for the first time in Florida that a garden-variety terminable-at-will contract violates the statute of frauds, as a matter of law, even though the parties could have fully performed it within one year or cancelled it at any time. The fact that the contractual relationship lasted more than a year is completely irrelevant. The contract was either valid or invalid on the day it was made. Yates v. Ball, 132 Fla. 132, 181 So. 341, 344-45 (1937) (fact that performance exceeded one year is not material to determination of whether contract violated statute of frauds). Nor does the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Yates v. BallSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- McPherson v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Niday v. NidayTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Acoustic Innovations, Inc. v. SchaferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Berger v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.