Legal Opinion

Cameron v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 6, 2006No. 4D06-3566PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

943 So.2d 938 (2006)

Gregory CAMERON, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D06-3566.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

December 6, 2006.

Gregory Cameron, Belle Glade, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

WARNER, J.

We affirm the order summarily denying appellant's motion for Rule 3.850 postconviction relief. We write to address his claim that his habitual offender sentence was improperly imposed through the use of hearsay evidence.

Appellant claims that the court erred in using hearsay evidence in the form of a letter and affidavit under seal from the Parole…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. Ricardo RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Yisrael v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Robert Williams v. Harold W. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. Williams v. ClarkeDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Young v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Grange v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Sharlow v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API