Legal Opinion

Julius Kessler & Co. v. Lackie

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1906No. Docket No. 60Published

Error to Clare; Dodds, J.' Assumpsit by Julius Kessler & Company against James Lackie and Colin McDonald for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This action was brought to recover on one of a series of notes given by defendants to plaintiff for a quantity of whisky purchased from plaintiff by defendants, and for which plaintiff delivered defendants a bonded warehouse receipt.

Aside from names, dates, and amounts, the warehouse receipt involved in this case is the same as those involved in Julius Kessler & Co. v. Veio, 142 Mich. 471, and Julius Kessler & Co. v. Zacharias, 145 Mich. 698. The purchase of the goods, the giving of the notes and of the receipts are the same as in Julius Kessler & Co. v. Zacharias.

The defense in this case is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Julius Kessler & Co. v. VeioMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Julius Kessler & Co. v. ZachariasMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API