Legal Opinion

London Consolidated Mining, Milling & Smelting Co. v. Findlay

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Parle County. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Beck, O. J.

The judgment in this case must be reversed for the failure of the evidence to support the verdict of the jury.

The complaint alleged that the defendant, The London Consolidated Mining, Milling and Smelting Company, having a lease of certain mines and the possession of a certain stamp mill, engaged the plaintiff to superintend the operations of the mines and mill, and authorized him to expend money for the benefit of the company, promising to pay him for his services, and to reimburse the moneys so paid out. The company denies in its answer having at the time alleged a lease of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Langley v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. Marshall v. BarryColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Marshall v. BarryColorado Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API