Legal Opinion

State v. Milligan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 2008No. COA08-151PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

The trial court’s refusal to allow the prosecutor’s notes into evidence was not an abuse of discretion and did not constitute error. The trial court properly denied defendant’s motions to dismiss each of the charges.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Tommy Wayne Milligan (defendant) was employed by Cameo Vaughn (Vaughn) as the defacto foreman of her vinyl siding business (“the company”). The company owned a burgundy Chevy Silverado truck with black ladder racks installed on top and a distinctive “Speak Up For Jesus” sticker on the rear bumper. Defendant was allowed for a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. GladdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  2. State v. CannonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API