Legal Opinion

Purvis v. Ferst's Sons & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 6, 1902PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Motion to dismiss writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

Four separate and distinct actions, each founded upon a promissory note, were brought by M. Ferst’s Sons & Company against Purvis and others. The defendants filed an answer in each case, and the plaintiffs filed a separate demurrer to each answer. The bill of exceptions recites that “ the demurrers filed by said plaintiffs to the pleas of the defendants, being exactly alike in each ease, were heard together, and were by tbe court sustained; *690to which ruling sustaining said demurrers defendants excepted, still except, and now assigns the same as error.” The bill of exceptions further recites…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Erwin v. EnnisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Wells v. Coker Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. FutchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  2. Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Harris v. Gano & JenningsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Paschal v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Askew v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API