Legal Opinion

Carter v. General Motors Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 16, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied that part of the cross motion of defendant Jay’s Chevrolet (Jay’s) seeking summary judgment dismissing the claim under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 417. The statute is “ ‘primarily designed to protect the purchasers [of used motor vehicles] from being sold an improperly equipped or defective vehicle’” (Pierce v International Harvester Co., 61 AD2d 255, 260, quoting statement of Counsel and Deputy Commissioner of Motor Vehicles in support of L 1954, ch 86, 1954 NY Legis Ann, at 263-264). Although Vehicle and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pierce v. International Harvester Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of South Point Auto Ctr., Inc. v. New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API