Timberlake Plantation Co. v. County of Lexington
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Chief Justice:
This is a declaratory judgment action in which the Court of Appeals held that a cable television company’s contract to become the exclusive provider of cable service to a residential development effectively created a monopoly, thereby inhibit*558ing competition in violation of section 601 of the Federal Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. § 521 (1991). Timberlake Plantation Co. v. County of Lexington, — S.C. —, 415 S.E. (2d) 824 (Ct. App. 1992). We granted certiorari and affirm as modified.
I. FACTS
Timberlake Plantation Company (Timberlake) is the developer of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Browning Ex Rel. Estate of Browning v. HartvigsenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Leppard v. Central Carolina Telephone Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
- McCormac v. EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
- Safety Building Loan Co. v. LylesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
- Knoerr v. CrewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Town of Kingstree v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- Davis v. EptingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994