Legal Opinion

Timberlake Plantation Co. v. County of Lexington

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 17, 1993No. 23861PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

This is a declaratory judgment action in which the Court of Appeals held that a cable television company’s contract to become the exclusive provider of cable service to a residential development effectively created a monopoly, thereby inhibit*558ing competition in violation of section 601 of the Federal Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. § 521 (1991). Timberlake Plantation Co. v. County of Lexington, — S.C. —, 415 S.E. (2d) 824 (Ct. App. 1992). We granted certiorari and affirm as modified.

I. FACTS

Timberlake Plantation Company (Timberlake) is the developer of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Browning Ex Rel. Estate of Browning v. HartvigsenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Leppard v. Central Carolina Telephone Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  3. McCormac v. EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  4. Safety Building Loan Co. v. LylesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  5. Knoerr v. CrewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Kingstree v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  2. Davis v. EptingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API