Legal Opinion

State v. Clasey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1968PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

Defendant was convicted of sodomy on his 15-year-old adopted daughter. Before trial, defendant moved the court to require the daughter and her mother to be examined by a psychiatrist. The “grounds” stated in the motion for requiring the examination stated “that nature of the charge makes this necessary since there is no evidence except complainant age 15 connecting defendant with commission of crime * * The motion was denied; renewed at the trial and again denied. The court’s refusal to require the examination is the principal issue on appeal.

Defendant urges that we adopt the rule stated by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. RusselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. WalgraeveOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Umatilla County v. United Bonding InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. JorgensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. State v. LooneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. FilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. GreggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  5. Dinkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API