Legal Opinion
Chidichimo v. Industrial Commission
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 8, 1996No. 1 — 94 — 2570WCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rakowski
Concetta Chidichimo (claimant), widow of Martin Chidichimo (decedent), filed an application for adjustment of claim pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act) (820 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 1994)), alleging her husband sustained a fatal heart attack on March 18, 1983, which arose out of and in the course of his employment with University of Chicago Press (employer). The arbitrator denied benefits, finding there was no accidental injury that arose out of or in the course of employment. Claimant presented additional evidence on review to the Industrial Commission (Commission),…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Caterpillar, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Ralston v. CasanovaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- American Family Insurance v. Village Pontiac-GMC, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Graves v. DaleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Diederich v. WaltersIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schusse v. Pace Suburban Bus Division of the Regional Transportation AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Chidichimo v. University of Chicago PressAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Chidichimo v. University of Chicago PressAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Schusse v. Pace Suburban Bus Division of the Regional Transportation AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002