Broadwater v. Foxworthy
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Hoemes, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Harrison, O. J.
On March 12, 1884, there was rendered in the district court of Lancaster county a judgment for the defendants in a replevin action as follows: “It is.now by the court considered and adjudged that said defendants have a return of the property taken by said plaintiff on the writ of replevin herein named in the verdict of the jury herein, 'to-wit, one brown mare, one two-horse wagon, and one double harness, and that in case a return of said property cannot' be had, that the defendants have and recover of and from the said plaintiff Lydia Broadwater the sum of $140, the value of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dwight v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Board of Commissioners v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Reeves v. PloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Ferguson v. MillenderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
- In re Van ScieverNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. EdmistenNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- Cave v. ReiserNebraska Supreme Court · 2004