Legal Opinion
Boone v. Kingsbury
California Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1928No. S. F. No. 12707; S. F. No. 12708; S. F. No. 12728; S. F. No. 12729; S. F. No. 12730; S. F. No. 12743; S. F. No. 12766Published
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
Original applications for writs of mandamus by which the validity of chapter 303, Statutes and Amendments of 1921, page 404, and certain specific sections *154thereof, and also chapter 285, Statutes and Amendments of 1923i, page 593, amendatory of said chapter 303, which provides for the granting of permits to residents of the state who are citizens of the United States, to enter and prospect upon tidal and submerged lands and to lease the same on a royalty basis, is assailed.
All of the petitioners herein are applicants for permits to enter and prospect for oil, oil shale, gas, phosphate, sodium…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Morrill v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.