Legal Opinion

Underwood v. Shepard

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 4, 1988No. 86-853PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs, Bruce Underwood and James and Sylvia Floyd, hereinafter we call them "the plaintiffs," from the judgment of the trial court holding that the defendants, Rose Lavonne Shepard, Buddy Eskew, and Retta C. White, had not provided an easement across a parcel of land for access to the waters of Smith Lake. On appeal, Underwood argues that the evidence clearly shows an easement by grant, necessity, or implication. We agree and reverse.

The facts of this case are as follows:

Robert White and his wife, Retta, owned land in Cullman County, Alabama. Their property…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gaston v. AmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. League v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Smith v. Style Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Cougar Min. Co. v. MINERAL LAND & MIN. CONSULT. INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hereford v. Gingo-Morgan ParkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Arp v. EdmondsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Polhemus v. CobbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Boyd v. BellSouth Telephone Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Arp v. EdmondsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API