Legal Opinion

Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. v. Schilling

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCanless

For convenience we will refer to the parties as in the Circuit Court: that is, the plaintiff in error, Rochester Capital Leasing Corporation, as the plaintiff, and the defendants in error, Billy R. Schilling and Josephine 0. Schilling, as the defendants. The plaintiff, a New York Corporation, having its principal place of business in Rochester, New York, sued the defendants to recover $3,028.75, plus interest and attorneys’ fees which it claimed the defendants owed it under the terms of a contract bearing date of November 10, 1964, by which it had leased to them fifteen postage stamp vending…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eastern Building & Loan Ass'n v. BedfordU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1898
  2. City of Waxahachie v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. United Artists Corp. v. Board of Censors of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Shoenterprise Corp. v. ButlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goodwin Brothers Leasing, Inc. v. NousisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Rochester Capital Leasing Corporation v. SpragueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  3. Nautical Landings Marina, Inc., David I. Denham v. First National Bank in Port Lavaca, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API