Legal Opinion

Goldner v. Kemper Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order, insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: The motion of defendants John F. Connell Consultants, Ltd. and Peter Rincones pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them should have been granted in its entirety. The two remaining counts as to which Special Term denied the motion allege that these defendants negligently investigated plaintiffs’ fire loss. Liability for negligent conduct may be imposed only if it can be established that the defendants owe a duty to the plaintiffs (see, Pulka…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. White v. GuarenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Calamari v. GraceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Henry v. Michael P. Guastella & Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Waldron v. RotzlerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1994
  2. Hall v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Village of New Paltz v. Merlex Contracting, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API