Legal Opinion
Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports
Decided February 28, 2000Published
1Opinion of the Court
The Honorable Boyd Hickinbotham State Representative P.O. Box 326 Salem, AR 72576-0326
Dear Representative Hickinbotham:
I am writing in response to your request for my opinion on the following question:
Assuming the following facts: (a) a developer has created an entity to maintain a development; (b) several years later, the developer sold his interest to another developer; (c) several years later, the development became a properly incorporated city; (d) the developer is currently receiving a franchise fee from one utility located in the city and is attempting to collect a fee from a second…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Little Rock v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF SOUTHWEST, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Newton, Cir. Clk. v. American Security CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Flake v. Thompson, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Wenderoth v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Ark. State Highway Comm. v. SherrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.