Legal Opinion

Childers v. Blair

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1923No. 2165PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKbett, J.

This suit was filed by M. W. Blair against Frank Childers and R. T. Crawford, plaintiffs in error, and L. S. Kent, defendant in error. The defendant in error H. H. Myers intervened. The controversy was over a commission of $6,250, which Kent, as owner, admitted owing. Blair claimed one-half of the commission. Myers claimed he and Blair were entitled to one-half. Chil-ders and Crawford claimed all of the commission. The trial without a jury resulted in a judgment allowing each of the claimants one-fourth of the amount in controversy. Kent employed Myers as broker and agreed to pay him 5 per…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bauer v. CrowTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Mann v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Victor Refining Co. v. City Nat. Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Brodage v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Davis v. BrunoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Victor Refining Co. v. City Nat. Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API