Legal Opinion

Luderitz v. Luderitz

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 27, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On final hearing on petition for divorce.

1Opinion of the Court

Leaming, V. C.

The testimony in this case was first concluded June 7th, 1917. I then stated to counsel that my views were that while petitioner had clearly sustained the burden of proof, I was unable to reach the conclusion that defendant’s guilt could be said to have been established beyond a reasonable doubt. In these circumstances I thought it my duty to call for additional evidence; counsel then agreed to submit such additional proofs as could be procured and the case was subsequently reopened and additional evidence offered in.behalf of the respective parties. I have since ordered a…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pfender v. PfenderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  2. Fulton v. Town of DoverSupreme Court of Delaware · 1888
  3. Bailey v. OsbornSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  4. State v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  5. Mills v. Central RailroadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API