Luderitz v. Luderitz
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On final hearing on petition for divorce.
1Opinion of the Court
Leaming, V. C.
The testimony in this case was first concluded June 7th, 1917. I then stated to counsel that my views were that while petitioner had clearly sustained the burden of proof, I was unable to reach the conclusion that defendant’s guilt could be said to have been established beyond a reasonable doubt. In these circumstances I thought it my duty to call for additional evidence; counsel then agreed to submit such additional proofs as could be procured and the case was subsequently reopened and additional evidence offered in.behalf of the respective parties. I have since ordered a…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Pfender v. PfenderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Fulton v. Town of DoverSupreme Court of Delaware · 1888
- Bailey v. OsbornSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- State v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
- Mills v. Central RailroadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.