City of Cameron v. Stinson
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MANFORD, Judge.
This appeal follows a jury conviction for maintaining a nuisance in violation of a city ordinance. The judgment is reversed and remanded.
Appellant presents no less than ten points of error on appeal. Due to the disposition of this case, only one of these points is considered and the remainder, while of questionable validity, are not addressed. In summary, appellant charges the trial court erred in the submission of the verdict-directing instruction (No. 5) as its format and construction were in violation of MAI-CR2d 2.04.
A brief summary of the facts suffices. Respondent (City…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of St. Louis v. Brune Management Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- City of Fredericktown v. HunterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- Kansas City v. BradleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Estill v. IannoneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- City of Webster Groves v. EricksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re MossieDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
- Wolford v. United States Leasing Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Opinion No. (1985), Missouri Attorney General Reports1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.