Legal Opinion

Succession of Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 30, 1987No. 87-C-1287PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Justice.

We granted writs in this case to decide whether a surviving spouse must judicially assert a claim to the marital portion within the three year prescriptive period provided for by La.Civ.Code art. 2436.1/ We conclude the claim need not be judicially asserted. The surviving spouse need only prove a claim was made within three years of the date of the death. We find, under the facts of this case, the widow has shown adequately she made a claim to the marital portion within the prescriptive period. Accordingly, we reverse the rulings of the lower courts sustaining the peremptory…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Succession of PiffetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  2. Maddox v. ButcheeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  3. Succession of TaconSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  4. Succession of AndrusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  5. Succession of LichtentagLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hennigan v. Succession of HenniganLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. In re the Succession of WeathersbyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API