Succession of Smith
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
COLE, Justice.
We granted writs in this case to decide whether a surviving spouse must judicially assert a claim to the marital portion within the three year prescriptive period provided for by La.Civ.Code art. 2436.1/ We conclude the claim need not be judicially asserted. The surviving spouse need only prove a claim was made within three years of the date of the death. We find, under the facts of this case, the widow has shown adequately she made a claim to the marital portion within the prescriptive period. Accordingly, we reverse the rulings of the lower courts sustaining the peremptory…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Succession of PiffetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
- Maddox v. ButcheeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Succession of TaconSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Succession of AndrusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Succession of LichtentagLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hennigan v. Succession of HenniganLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- In re the Succession of WeathersbyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990