Legal Opinion

Chelsea Exchange Bank v. Travelers Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, The Travelers Insurance Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 8th day of March, 1916, sustaining a demurrer to the first separate defense contained in the answer on the ground that it is insufficient in law.

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J.:

This is an action in aid of an attachment. The complaint sets forth that in an action brought in the Supreme Court, New York county, by the Chelsea National Bank against Alfred H. Motley, Jr., a warrant of attachment was duly issued on September 16, 1914, in the sum of $1,101.25 which was duly served on defendant, the property levied upon consisting of an indebtedness of defendant to said Motley in the sum of $1,281.63, “being the cancellation value of two certain policies issued by The Travelers Insurance Company upon the- life of Alfred H. Motley, Jr., being numbers 128565 and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baxter v. . McDonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. People v. FabianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. John H. Parker Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cheatham v. Wheeling & L. E. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  2. First Nat. Bank of Burkburnett v. FriendCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Pierce v. BristolNew York Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API