Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Tuttle v. Corey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 24, 1923PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is a bill in equity brought by a conservator, in behalf of Ann Tuttle, against the defendant, William H. Corey, wherein it is alleged in substance that Frank W. Hoit was appointed and qualified conservator of the estate of Ann Tuttle on December 17, 1919, because of her advanced age and mental weakness. Since the completion of the hearings before the master, Ann Tuttle (the plaintiff) died on April 6, 1921. George H. Tuttle was appointed and duly qualified as administrator of the estate of Ann Tuttle; and he, as such administrator, together with himself personally and Willie Warren…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Cook v. ScheffreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Warfield v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Bradley v. BordenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. A. T. Stearns Lumber Co. v. HowlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Chopelas v. ChopelasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. RobertsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Markey v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API